A new report from the Union of Concerned Scientists outlines the potential affects of Climate Change on Missouri if significant changes are not made soon. The report identifies several environmental threats and predicts their severity according to two different scenarios, one in which we manage to curb emissions, and other in which emissions continue their rise. It then offers a plan for Missouri to minimize it’s contribution to global warming.
The first global-warming related threat the report discusses is also the most direct, heat. The report’s main metric for heat is the increase in the number of days above 90 and 100 degrees each summer. According the low-emission level prediction, such days would increase to around 60 a year by the end of the century. The high-emission prediction shows that level being passed about midway through the century, with more than a hundred days over 90 degrees each summer come 2100. The report makes frequent reference to the 1995 Chicago heat wave, caused by a mere 7 straight days over 90 degrees, which killed between 450 to 700 people. The report warns that, under the high-emissions scenario, such events would occur regularly in Saint Louis, happening at least six times a summer by the end of the century.
The second threat the report assesses is that of flooding and drought. With increased heat, precipitation will be less frequent but more intense, with Fall, Winter, and Spring becoming wetter, while Summers get drier. While the danger of long-term droughts will decrease, short term droughts will increase, as most rain that falls will be in the form of intense downpours. These downpours will lead to increased flooding and decreased water quality, as the heavier rains cause more runoff and overflowing the sewers, causing pollutants and raw sewage to enter the waterways.
The final threat the report looks at is the threat global warming poses to Missouri’s agricultural industry. While increased temperatures will lead to a longer growing season, any benefit would fail to counteract the large amounts of crops lost to heat stress. Corn crops can fail at 95 degrees, and as extended periods of extreme heat become more frequent, so does crop failure. Another threat Missouri farmers would face as temperatures increase is crop pests like the corn ear-worm spreading north. Normally, corn ear-worms can only thrive one out of every three years in southern Missouri, and once a decade in northern Missouri. In addition, the changes in precipitation described above could devastate Missouri’s farmers. Only 7% of Missouri farms have access to irrigation, so between spring flooding and summertime droughts Missouri farmers are likely to lose a good deal of their crops, much more than they would stand to gain from the longer growing season.
The report then moves on to describe several steps Missouri has taken to reduce it’s impact on global warming, as well as outlining several programs Missouri could adopt to further decrease it’s global warming impact. The proposals are as follows:
Click here for the full report from the Union of Concern Scientists >
The posts and comments here are the views of the authors. SSL reserves the right to delete spam or other offensive material.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
July 31st, 2009 at 9:59 am
I knew it was bad but this really lays it out. With buildings accounting for 38-40% of CO2 emmissions this points out how critical green building is. I hope we citizens get very active in urging our local, state and federal legislators to take swift action. Glad to see cities like Creve Coeur, Clayton and St. Louis take an active role in greening their buildings and operations. Let’s work to get more on board.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
So what can we do in St. Louis? St. Louis County and MoDoT are already wasting stimulus money and filling wetlands to build Highway 141 literally up against residents’ back yards; which will increase flooding and deteriorate vegetation and wildlife critical to balance of the environment. People will rely on watering their lawn more and using chemicals to fight off mosquitoes. The Indianan bat is already in jeopardy and so is the snowy egret that will both be one of the many species effected by the project. Municipal officials already tell homeowners that it’s their fault they moved near water, when it’s the city planners who allow development to alter the flow of water away from natural absorbing areas downstream until the water systems overflow. The County and MoDoT say that if they can’t survive it then it is natural selection and that it’s for the greater good. Many are coming to the realization that it’s a problem, but what can we do?