St. Louis Weatherization Program Creates 39 Jobs
A program that provides weatherization assistance to low-income St. Louis residents has created 39 new green jobs and could add more.
Last year, the Urban League of Metropolitan St. Louis, led by President and Chief Executive Jim Buford, received nearly $7.4 million in federal stimulus money to provide free home weatherizing for low-income families and to expand the program to residents with income at the 200 percent of the federal poverty level.
The program reduces utility costs for residents by $260 to $700 a year by sealing leaks and boosting the efficiency of furnaces and hot water tanks.
Every $1 million invested in weatherization creates at least 16 direct, full-time jobs, as well as additional jobs in the clean energy, said the Apollo Alliance, citing data from the Political Economy Research Institute.
In Missouri, the weatherization program currently supports 450 jobs.
The Apollo Alliance, along with Legacy Building Group, led by CEO Todd Weaver, and the Green Building Council-Greater St. Louis Area Chapter, led by Executive Director Emily Andrews, plan to recognize the Urban League’s weatherization program Tuesday as an example of the potential for green job creation nationally.
The Apollo Alliance, based in San Francisco, is a coalition of labor, business, environmental and community leaders pushing for green jobs and clean energy.
The posts and comments here are the views of the authors. SSL reserves the right to delete spam or other offensive material.
1 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Business Resources
A comprehensive list of local and global resources
Join our Mailing List
Sign up to receive our eNewsletter on local sustainable news & events.
Become a Sponsor
Learn more about opportunities to contribute to our organization. Read more >
Join Our Social Networks
March 4th, 2010 at 7:17 pm
You should check out “Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt if you really think government spending creates jobs. In brief, since the government produces little itself every dollar it spends is a dollar taken from someone in the private sector. They may have created 39 jobs, but how many jobs were lost because of the taxation? Remember that Spain’s “green jobs” program cost $774000 per job! I’m pretty confident Spain lost more jobs than they gained because of it, and the same may be true here. These programs cannot be justified on a jobs basis, although they may be justified for other reasons.